Another one of those surprises was the $2.9-billion project to build three support ships for the Canadian navy, and that's also running into problems. Again, I know you can't get into the specifics of it.
The other comment was that they're simply asking the private sector to take on too much risk. That's one of the factors that's causing this to be unattractive and for them to not want to bid on some of these larger projects. You would think that these larger projects would be fairly attractive; if you have a 20% contingency on a several-billion-dollar project, that's a fairly substantive contingency. It gives you a lot of room to move.
What do you make of that comment, speaking generally of the amount of risk you're asking these private contractors to take on in these projects and its implications on costing?