No it wasn't, and the basis for that.... An individual in Public Works told me in confidence that there had been a second evaluation done and that the original scores were in fact very close. Now, this person was a contractor working in Public Works, so I was unwilling to name him, because of course he would have been out of a job immediately if I had. The tribunal said it couldn't take information from anonymous sources. If I had been able to give the guy some kind of whistle-blower protection, I could have done it. I was unwilling to sacrifice that person.
On June 10th, 2008. See this statement in context.