Here's what happened on the fourth one.
The RFP process required PWGSC to check references. You had to have three project references, and the RFP process required that they be verified. We realized eventually that they hadn't done that. So that was a violation of the evaluation process. We filed that in September 2007, or around that timeframe, and then what happened—it was just mind-boggling, to tell you the truth—is that after we filed the complaint, Public Works said they would then check the references. So the contract was awarded October 31, and they were scurrying around like crazy trying to check these references on October 30, a year after the evaluation had been done. It was just an unbelievable thing.
The CITT said that was fine. That was the basis of their ruling. It doesn't make much sense to me, but that's what they said.