Well, in terms of the urgent specification, the rationalization that was used was that the year-end was coming up. Everyone understands the year-end process—of course, that's March 31 in the government. Their argument was, well, things are busier during the year-end, and we don't want to go through this transition to the new contract during year-end, so it has to be awarded by October 31. That was the rationalization.
Now, in my view, they could have just waited until after the year-end. There are many other arguments, but this is the argument that was presented, and that's the basis. CITT has no power to make a ruling on this. When they get the memo from Public Works, that's it: the stop contract award is gone.