So you're basically telling me that you aren't obliged on a contract that's up to $400 million. I just wanted that on the record, because what we see written is that $250 million is the kickoff point at which the fairness monitor has to come in. We now have you on record saying, “No, that's not the case”.
I don't have much time here.
Mr. Poole, earlier one of my colleagues asked you a question about Mr. Jirka Danek, and you said he was not a shareholder, or the largest shareholder in a company, even though he works for Public Works.
You wrote a letter, though, to TPG dated May 29, 2006, stating that Mr. Danek was a controlling shareholder of a public company called Avalon Works, which has been providing service to Public Works for a number of years, and which is a significant subcontractor on the ETS contract, which is held by TPG, and which gets a significant percentage of its revenue from its relationship with TPG.
Why did you just tell us that you didn't know he was a large shareholder in a company that bids on Public Works contracts?