Somewhat, yes. I mean, according to the reasons they have given us, it's not because of cost savings, as far as we're concerned; it's not because they're supporting SMEs, as far as we're concerned; and it's not consistent with the rules of good governance.
It's probably because they have a concept that bigger is better and they'll get things done with one contract or with one “partner” over the next 20 years. We've seen how large IT contracts have proceeded in the federal government. Historically, they've failed. They've been unmanageable, they've had cost overruns, and they've delivered very little on what they were originally required to do for the federal government and their clients.