I don't think it is speculation to say there was a leak. There certainly was a leak, so that's not speculation. It is also not speculation to say there was no interference in the U.S. primaries, because there certainly and clearly was interference. In fact, it was picked up by the U.S. media, and it did have an impact on Mr. Obama's campaign. So these are not speculations; these are actually reported stories out there in the public.
The other comment I would like to make is that it seems to me, in reading your chronology, that the fingers always point to Ian Brodie, the chief of staff to the Prime Minister, yet there is no conclusion here at all in that regard. All the attribution is toward him.
So how do you reconcile the fact that there is a pointing of the finger toward him, and yet there is nothing in your conclusions that would support that?