I agree that it probably should have been done. What I don't understand is that right now for, say, the Harry Hays Building alone, instead of $5 million a year, we're going to be paying $20 million a year. That's going to have to come from someplace. The money that is being accrued from this sale will probably go back into general revenues and we'll never see it again.
At the end of the 25 years, these buildings in key urban locations are going to be worth a lot more money than they are now, and we'll have the opportunity to buy them back at market value? In that case, the Canadian taxpayer will have to make a severe choice, because you're telling me that these seven buildings will make Larco the single largest landlord to the federal government, because there are 12,000 employees. What are we going to do in 25 years, put them out in the street? Or are we going to have to pay the full market value for seven buildings for which we're on the hook to pay, from years 11 to 25, 50% of all the capital costs to make sure those buildings will be worth full market value?