Thank you, Minister.
I'll just make two points, and I'll defer to my colleague, Mr. McGrath, to fill in the blanks.
The approach Public Works took is essentially based on what the Department of Justice considers to be proper steps vis-à-vis consultation with aboriginal people, whether it is the Musqueam band or the Algonquin band. Essentially we got what I would call the framework from the Department of Justice. There is no set threshold for that. It's just that we had a number of steps in mind. We interacted with them and we went through those steps systematically, so that's the first thing.
The second thing is that this is also why the lease was built to be a 25-year lease that at the end would revert back to us. That's another element that was considered to be critical.
The third point I would make is simply that we had the capacity, in view of the reality that existed vis-à-vis the Musqueam band, to essentially sever those two properties and still move ahead with the transaction, which we did.
Essentially I just want to say here that the framework was followed and proper risk mitigation measures taken vis-à-vis the Musqueam Nation.
Now I'll turn to your question about specifics, and I'll turn to my colleague, Tim McGrath, who can give you examples of the steps we took in that consultation.