I'll start with the front end and I'll let my officials deal with the back end in terms of the exact consultation that took place.
My understanding of the decision is not that we didn't consult. My understanding of this injunction is that a judge decided that on the balance of inconvenience, it weighed in favour of the first nations, because obviously if we sold the buildings, the ability for the first nations to advance their arguments and make their point, given that the assets would be sold, would disappear.
The issue hasn't been resolved. We need to be very prudent here, because this case is before the courts. As you know, we are taking this to appeal, but I wouldn't want you to read into the decision of the judge, if I may say so, that we didn't consult; we consulted, but a judge decided that should we sell, the damages that would be suffered by the first nations would be greater, in his opinion, than if he allowed the sale and allowed us and them to negotiate on other terms.