Just adding to the point the deputy minister makes, the judgment was that they would wait for the judicial review. If the judicial review is carried out and goes in our favour, we will then have the right to proceed with the sale of the two assets.
So as the minister was pointing out, to rectify that situation if the judicial review were to find in favour of the Musqueam, the judge felt that our proceeding now would be too detrimental or too financially punitive to the crown in order to buy the properties back at that point in time.
It wasn't that it was an injunction against the sale. It was an injunction waiting for the judicial review to be carried out. We're appealing that decision, but the judicial review should also be carried out within the next twelve months.
In terms of what we did, our first contact was March 7, 2007. We then had to send a follow-up notice on April 17, and then another letter asking for a meeting and explaining to the Musqueam the type of information required to determine rights on the particular property.
There were almost twelve different points of contact between March 7 and August 30, 2007, including two face-to-face meetings with the Musqueam themselves, seeking information to determine the rights on those particular two pieces of property. At that point, we never received any type of information ascertaining that they had rights on those two particular pieces of property. In any event, the injunction was granted and we'll wait for the judicial review.