Just to follow up on that point and not to put you in the middle of a political debate, but there is a difference between naming a specific asset and providing the public with a basis upon which you assess what the value of the sale of that asset is, and the process that is being provided for in this budget, which is not naming any assets; it is simply saying there is a general review of assets as well as the programs and the government intends to get to this number. So you would agree.... Well, you don't have to agree; I'll just make the statement. I'm not going to put you in the middle of this argument with Mr. Calandra, but there is a big difference between those two things.
I appreciate very much the comments that you had a chance to read coming in, Mr. Botham, where you said that the government will not engage in a fire sale of assets, which I suppose is a matter of definition. However, would you agree with me that it is a little strange to announce the number that you expect to arrive at before you've actually determined whether there are any assets that are worthy of sale or whether it's a good time to sell?
Do you see what I'm saying?