You've raised a number of questions here, so let me see if I can tackle them. My colleagues may have to help me.
On the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, chapter 3, funding small craft harbours, for instance, I think the question was on what happens to the money if they can't spend it immediately. There may be a couple of elements to the answer to that question. If they've made commitments and the money's not spent in the fiscal year, they can ask for re-profiles. The Department of Finance and Treasury Board would have to agree to those. There may be a question here--and I'll leave it to my colleague--on “use it or lose it”, in terms of the funding.
Your second question was really on the EI extension--the five-week EI funding--and whether HRSDC could ask for additional resources beyond those in the budget. That would require new funding and a different process. One of my colleagues should probably deal with that, because we are still dealing with what's in the budget. Anything over and above that requires policy approval, Treasury Board approval, a source of funds, etc. So there are a number of elements that have to happen. I'll leave that question to my colleagues.
The third point was on why Treasury Board can't provide this information, as opposed to the departments. We see things at the end of the process and approve the funding, so our window is perhaps a little more limited sometimes than other central agencies in what we see. But we have that information when the departments come in and say they can't spend the money and are looking for a re-profile, or they need more money. We only see part of the story. The three central agencies work together and collectively see more of the story as it evolves.
Perhaps my colleagues can address the second question.