It's an interesting analogy. I think it's close, but it's not quite the right analogy.
Let me start by suggesting that, I think I'll say, although there are maybe 120, plus or minus, networks of varying sizes, depending on the size of the department, I don't kid myself in that I don't expect the Department of National Defence to be part of this or expect some of the departments that might not want to come onto the shared service. So the Government of Canada might end up having 20 networks as opposed to 120. It will be a smaller number. I don't think it will ever be one actual network.
I don't see it as one skyscraper; I see it as houses, five-storey buildings, and ten-storey buildings right across the country because of where the government operates. We're talking about infrastructure where the government operates, and the government doesn't operate in one location; it operates right across the country. You need people to cover that infrastructure in all those locations. So if I take a tall Government of Canada building here in Ottawa today—or it could be anywhere; it could be in Montreal or in Vancouver, but where there are multiple departments in that building that is being served today, the carriers are bringing multiple connections into that building, multiple separate connections into that building.