What happens if we take bundling too far? For example, on GENS, it makes sense, and I think you understand why it makes sense, because we're trying to close down this network, especially under attack, and to reduce the cost. So those are the sorts of things, where there are really only three or four major companies that can do that. It isn't something SMEs can play in. They can't actually do it anyway; they don't have the capital infrastructure behind to do it.
But then we take the next step further and ask, now what can we bundle? Do we bundle all the switches or routers inside every government department? Is there an advantage to doing that? I think, for me, the answer is no. But there are advantages to having standards, to saying this equipment must talk to this equipment, and to set up those standards. To bundle everything and just give it to one company means that you're not going to allow the other companies to sell to the Canadian government.
I believe very much that we should have standards. A standard that I can think of is something as simple as on your desktop. When your desktop boots up in the government, it comes up with a standard government webpage, and you start there. There are also some standards on helpdesk tools that you could put on the machine. It doesn't mean making everybody absolutely the same, because every department has its unique needs as well, but there are a few things we could do better that are the same.
Again, there is no need to bundle more; just make it standard so they work with each other.