Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I'll just reiterate, thank you for the presentation. It's very full and very helpful.
I first want to acknowledge a general support for SMEs. Certainly from my personal perspective, having worked in what used to be called the ISIT sector—that's dating me—both for very large companies and for a very large number of SMEs over the last 20 years, I understand very much what you're trying to do in terms of balancing. I'm very supportive of finding that balance, both for the companies involved, both large and small, and also for the government. I appreciate everything that you've done here.
I will just note that your concern about allowing managers to manage is interesting. When the Federal Accountability Act was brought in—and there are a lot of very good things about it— there were some real concerns at the time about establishing too many rules and too many restrictions, that this would in fact hinder the progress. So I appreciate the fact that you've raised that here, because it is a concern for a number of us as well...as we reach for our BlackBerrys to make sure they don't ring.
I have a large number of questions, actually, to ask you about bundling. I'm curious about your relationship and contrasting CATA with ITAC, for example. First, can I ask you—because we're in short rounds—when you talk about bundling, can you pretend we're really dumb for a minute and just give us an example in this particular example? So you're encouraging large companies to deal with GENS in terms of the large network piece. Can you give us a couple of concrete examples of where bundling specific services in this sphere would be a problem?