I think it's part of the group's desire to support SMEs where possible, in the larger context of the government having to be efficient both in terms of getting the job done, but also cost-effectively.
We did ask representatives of ITAC--a couple of whom in their other lives had represented large companies--about set-asides. They were very open to say they'd be more than happy if that was a requirement in an RFP, but in some cases that might increase the cost of the program.
We're not at this point deciding whether the government should be willing to incur greater costs, but we have been having that discussion. I just wanted to follow up and hear your perspective.
Are we running out of our four minutes?