We'll definitely have a witness or two at the consideration of the bill before we do clause-by-clause, but, Mr. Martin, I hope you keep in mind that this is what I understand is a mathematical tweak to the pension calculations. It doesn't have to do with whether or not there is a superannuation plan or not.
It's a very minor administrative tweak, but you will stand advised as to what's relevant and what's not in terms of your knowledge of the envelope. It's the chair's view that there wouldn't be a lot of issues imported on this bill, but members will make their own decisions on that. That is scheduled for that day, and should something arise during that meeting, we'll deal with it as a committee.
As I say, if there is time at that meeting, members may want to take advantage of that window to provide some preliminary instructions--not final instructions--to research staff in the drafting of a report on the procurement study.
As you probably know, the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner, which is the office created by Bill C-2, the accountability act--it has been often referred to as the whistle-blower mechanism--has tabled her report. That is referred to our committee. In addition, her main estimates are before us. I think we should schedule a meeting to deal with all of those things, including our plans and priorities. If members feel otherwise, they should speak up now; otherwise, we'll build it into a future meeting.