I asked the question, Mr. Delisle, because I don't see that concern raised in what is obviously a letter in reference to you and the great work you're doing. But either they believe it's not an issue or you believe it's an important issue.
I happen to side with you on this, but I have to side only because I tend to believe there's a glaring omission here. With this legislation, if it's to be open, we have to find a way to make sure that we cover that problem.
In order to do that, though, you're suggesting four recommendations. Could you live with just one, or perhaps two--the issue of parity on civilians and the issue of ensuring that there is consistency between RCMP, even if it has to be retroactive?