The only comment I would offer is that it goes back to the issue in terms of the scope. Again, you're getting into the RCMP Act and away from the RCMPSA. If you want to recommend that they're considered as employees, well, this act isn't going to allow you to do that. That's a different act. So I can't address that question.
If you're asking whether we should be looking at the issue in terms of impact on members, and looking down the road at perhaps a more collective view of the organization, then yes, we could do that. But the point that I would also make is that the SRRs have identified a variety of issues that go beyond what we have here. This is a burning issue that's been dragging on for a number of years. We're trying to move forward on it. But there are other issues that aren't identified here and that we have to address in the future.
I assure you that the SRRs, or the individual members, will be tracking what we do and how we perform, and will consistently remind us of things that still have to be done and that we'll have to look at in the future.
Again, the core issue is that it's the RCMP Act. So in terms of a lot of these questions, if they were employees, they would get the pension.