Exactly, Mr. Chair. I was wondering if we could have our witnesses comment with regard to what this would in fact change. My understanding, from the testimony in our last meeting, is that a change such as this would not be accepted by CRA, and that is where the root of this problem or this change would come from.
Perhaps you could elaborate on what in fact the change would do. And would this act be all that would need to be changed in order for what has been identified by Mr. Ménard to be a reality, in his mind and I think a lot of people's minds, to be satisfied?