Let me finish the question. The journalist comes to the office and says, “I have information about A, B, C”, with relative particularity. But it's all hearsay, that information having been derived from an actual public servant who knows that much or more. So my question is, does the journalist obtain the protections of the statute through your office by the very nature of the fact that he or she has delivered the information? Is there any immunity attached to that? And is there any distinction between that information because it is totally hearsay and second-hand, and so if you want to—
On May 12th, 2009. See this statement in context.