No, that's not correct. I'll let Mr. Smith get into some of the details, but there will be a report out in June, and we were just discussing that. There will be another report in September--in respect of vote 35. That's what you're asking about.
In respect of the operating budgets of departments, the operating programs, which is essentially $100 billion, give or take $1 billion--Mr. Smith can get it down to the penny--that is being handled in the strategic review. Every year we take approximately 25% of the operating programs--approximately 25%, because we started one year a little late--and the departments identify 5% of what they consider to be the poorest performing departments. They then bring that forward to Treasury Board.
So roughly somewhere between $20 billion and $25 billion a year, bring it forward, and then there's 5% of that, with recommendations for reallocation of that money. That's just prudent practice to ensure that money is being properly spent. If government departments are indicating that this 5% is the poorest performing program, then it's incumbent upon government to look at that 5% and say, “What do we do with that money? Do we reinvest it back into that department? Do we reallocate it elsewhere?” And that's what this strategic review does. It doesn't affect the ordinary running of the department until a decision has been made in that respect.
Maybe Mr. Smith can clarify that if I haven't been clear.