I understand the question. The $100 million, in reality, will total to more than what we would have done. To give you a clear idea, for instance, we had budgeted an amount for the Alexandra Bridge of $50 million or so. If we had not had the AIP increment to the base, we probably would have waited for a year to get that increment in order to bridge the gap between the original approval of $30 million and where we ended up, with $52 million. So if I did not get part of that $100 million out of the AIP vote 35, I would not have been able to kick-start that project. We had to go get revised approval, but I would not have had a source of funds. Part of that $100 million for the Alexandra Bridge, for example, gave me that source of funds.
I want to be respectful and fair. You're right. I'm not saying that the Alexandra Bridge is solely out of the $100 million of the AIP. I'm not saying that at all. We were using our base. We had that discussion yesterday. The top-up would have required time for us to be able to put what we're doing now with that contractor, Pomerleau. We awarded the project contract on March 16. We probably would have obtained that cash six, seven, or eight months down the road.
Is that fair to say that, Tim?