I think the repeal of section 18.2 is not a measure that directly affects stimulus very much one way or the other. So I wouldn't want to suggest it is a stimulus measure.
I think, though, there are some economic consequences that may be related to the provision, or the absence of that provision. Many Canadian businesses were concerned about the effect of section 18.2, because what it did, as I noted before, was to deny interest deductibility on certain debt taken out to make investments in other countries, or outside of Canada.
I think for many Canadian businesses, it's important for their health, and therefore for the health of the Canadian economy, that they be able to operate on a basis that is fair vis-à-vis their competitors in other jurisdictions. The concern that had been expressed, as was reflected in the report of the expert panel on international taxation, was that Canadian businesses were operating at a disadvantage compared with their competitors, if they were going to be subject to a provision like section 18.2.
Those are some of the reasons and considerations behind the decision to eliminate that section. Again, while I don't think it relates to stimulus directly—