I very much appreciate Mr. Martin's comments, and our preference, absolutely, would be to have this information by June 19. However, in recognizing the challenges we've had in getting this motion put forward, in the interest of moving it forward on a collective basis, we were willing to allow the extra time.
I want to say that I understand Mr. Warkentin's comments. I am supportive of the fact that we can receive this information through our offices. I can assure my colleagues that some of us will in fact be working through the summer, continuing to keep the government to account. Our jobs don't stop simply because the session stops; quite the contrary, so we will be looking at this information very carefully.
The motion is quite straightforward, so I don't want Mr. Warkentin's comments about, 'Well, it's not going to be audited and we may not actually get all of the information that we're expecting'.... I stress the language of the motion is very straightforward, that this is the information we are looking for and that is the information we expect to receive by June 25.