I think what we have to understand is that we're actually trying to build infrastructure for all Canadians. It's difficult when you get into some of these larger urban settings as to whether an LRT infrastructure project or a ring road project is specific to the riding it's actually in or a benefit to a whole entire area. We're seeing that, actually, in many of the urban settings. Unfortunately, some of the opposition parties try to play silly with the numbers, because it's a benefit to everyone; it's a benefit to Canadians. Even some of the rural major highways or major highway corridors help perhaps even the neighbouring province as much as the province they're in, because they are through routes for a lot of goods.
I say that because that's kind of the case in the riding you're suggesting, which is the only opposition riding, Edmonton--Strathcona. There's $14.8 million there, going to the GO Community Centre. It's a disproportionate amount of money in that riding, compared to the neighbouring ridings around it. That's because it is part of a project at the university.
So it's silly to get into the numbers as to whether this riding has a little bit more than that riding, because what we're really focused on is what is in the best interest of infrastructure long term, giving us the competitive edge coming out of this recession and far into the future. To do that, you have to put politics aside and start looking at what is in the best interest. The provinces have done that; so have municipalities and so have mayors of cities. We're just very pleased to be able to come alongside, to be able to help out, to stimulate the economy at a time when jobs need to be created and good projects are being created. I guess that's the best way I can answer that.