Yes, definitely. The other thing is that you have to remember you're to look at stimulus in the context of the whole suite of programs we offer. The Building Canada programs, for example, strictly focus on new construction. We don't do rehabilitation/repair work.
So for stimulus, again, as Yaprak mentioned, because it's a very short-term program, allowing rehabilitation and repair work made sense, not just for the timeframe for the funding we have, but also because it makes good asset management sense. I'm investing in repairing and rehabilitation of my asset and I am prolonging the life of that asset, so maybe I don't need to replace my building or my bridge for another 20 years by doing that work now.
We certainly encourage the repair and rehabilitation, but the program was open if you had a new building or a new arena and you could still build it in the two-year timeframe. In every application, the proponents attested to the fact they believed this project could be built. Now we'll monitor them as we go.