This is where I become a little bit confused, because in reading the policy and the FIP, it certainly seems to me that although it doesn't exclude certain things, by including certain things, without a catch-all saying “by the way, anything else will go”...there is a certain element of “not everything will go” in government advertising. By including reference to Government of Canada symbols and accepted symbols, there is a requirement, I think. There should be.
Ultimately, in terms of compliance, if decisions are made to have a certain branding element to advertising made by the PCO, by the PMO, in your description here you do have that the Treasury Board Secretariat does in fact have the responsibility of monitoring the policy implementation and compliance.
Can you tell me who in Treasury Board would look at those directions from the PMO, from cabinet, from the PCO, and determine, yes, you have complied with the communications policy, yes, we have decided that the use of X slogan or the use of X colour scheme or the use of X number of photos, for example...? Who in Treasury Board would actually say, yes, this complies with the communications policy? And what criteria would be used? But I'm really trying to focus in on who.