Okay, thank you.
I doubt we'll ask you to do that. It sounds crazy.
I notice that a lot of the infrastructure.... Well, I think I know why there's a lot more road infrastructure. There's a kind of Huey Long mentality: the more projects you have, the more signs you can put up, and filling potholes is a very popular thing to do.
I see that the province of Ontario has a lot of projects. I know the dollar figure is on a per capita basis. But there are a lot of small projects--1,721 projects in total. And I understand that, because you get to put a sign up on each one. I think that's the reasoning.
My question, though, is in terms of the federal contribution and the provincial contribution. In most provinces they're almost equal, almost exactly the same. In Ontario, the federal contribution is $200 million higher than the provincial contribution. I'm going to leave that as a question that I hope you can answer at the end of my comments.
My last question is this. From a communications point of view, is there any consideration of contracting out a new wordmark for the Government of Canada in terms of the federal identification? I ask this because the wordmark that we're all used to has been compromised to the extent that people don't see a great nation when they see that wordmark now. They see the sponsorship scandal. They see Chuck Guité. They see Buryl Wiseman. They see all these sleazy characters ruining the good name of our country. Is it part of the plan to design a new wordmark for Canada as the main label, the main logo, for the country?
Those two questions probably use up my time.