Let me just add to that, Madam Hall Findlay.
First, GENS is not a project. It is really a supply arrangement that will result in a number of projects going forward.
Today there are 124—and correct me, John, if I'm wrong—telecommunications networks in use by the federal government, through that many and more independent contracts. Many of these are very old and are at end of life. And there are more modern and cost-effective capabilities available in the marketplace.
So GENS, as it is articulated, is a supply arrangement looking to come up with vendors that qualify to be used by departments and agencies to renew the telecommunications services they are already running.
Once the procurement process is complete—and in fact in parallel with that—initial departments and agencies that plan to renew their telecommunications facilities and services are building their specific business cases. And they would use our business case template to say this is what they're doing today and why, what programs and services their networks are supporting in this department or agency, this is why they believe they need to renew these, and given the results of the procurement process and the costs that will come back, here is the relative comparison of today, tomorrow, transition, and so on. So they'll be able to finalize their business cases.
And then, if they have the authority within their department to proceed, they could call up against that procurement arrangement and immediately initiate a project to transition from their existing networks to the new, using the new supply arrangements.
If the project within their department were to exceed their individual departmental authority, depending on the amount of money in question, then they would come to the board with a request, an EPA for the approval to proceed on that migration or transition project.