I see.
We have studied a variety of contracts, including lease-back contracts. I was under the impression that when the government sold a building, but undertook to lease it back for a certain number of years, it only had to pay expenses relating to the building's interior, and that the buyer, under the terms of the lease signed with the government, had to pay for the general upkeep of the building.
Mr. McBain, could any of the lease-back contracts signed by the government over the past years have been renegotiated? Are the lease-back contracts in question the ones that were signed over the past 3 or 4 years, or are they pre-existing contracts that were renegotiated and that now cost us more money?
That could be a factor as well. Do the buildings the government leases cost more than the buildings it owns? Would it be possible to have a breakdown of the costs? I understand that labour costs and tax costs come into play. But I would like to know what our biggest expense is at the moment? What is costing us the most?