Thank you for the question.
In terms of the presentation of these figures, I could see how one would assume the projects were being cancelled. This reflects our need to align our votes with the actions that are being undertaken.
When the department put its economic action plan submission together, we did so at a macro level. We did an estimation of how much would be done through repair and how much would be done through capital votes. When we have since put our plans in place, most of the actions we have taken through the economic action plan are in the repair budget, or vote 1, so it does not, in my opinion, reflect a diminishment of our projects; it reflects the nature of the funding that is used to support the execution of the work. We are still completing that amount of work. This is more or less a funding vote alignment to make sure it accurately reflects the nature of the work.
The bulk of our work for our portfolio is done in our repair budget, which is vote 1. This transfer reflects that we are moving the money from the capital vote to the repair vote to reflect where the work will be done.