Mr. Rath-Wilson, would you be able to do it? I think we have received a lot of information--what we received last time, what the Auditor General told us, and what we have reviewed. And when we asked for a business case, you did send us a template, and the French version I've left on Madame Bourgeois' desk. But I guess that's not the template they were looking for. They are looking for an exact business case that justifies going with GENS rather than anywhere else, despite the fact that the Auditor General has kept on saying that large projects are not the way to go, that they should be broken down into different components. She has been saying that for 12 years.
That's where the frustration of the committee comes from. We're not doing your work. We do not want to do your work. We do not want to get into the operational issue. All we know is we're being bombarded by small and medium-sized enterprise, saying this is what the Auditor General says. So if you have a business case that justifies that GENS is the way to go, that your RFP took into consideration the number of users--remember, you gave us a process flow, and I'm sorry the committee did not have a look at the process flow because the binder is so big--but your RFP chooses contractors without finding users.... If you can explain that to us in the next round of questions, in your final remarks, and submit to the committee the business case you prepared, it would be very much appreciated.
Thank you.
Mr. Gourde, you have eight minutes.