Madam Chair, through you, if I may, it seems to me there's some wordsmithing around what Ms. Hall Findlay is talking about. It ties into what Madame Bourgeois has said, that she's looking for some specific clarity around Quebec. I'm not sure I have my head around that either as yet. It seems to me there are a lot of well-intended pieces to this.
Could I ask that this come back in another form that's tighter and cleaner so that I can understand it, please? I'm not trying to be obstructionist, but it would be useful for us to have this correct. I refer back to the clerk's comments.
Madam Chair, what are your thoughts on that?