It's rather interesting, because I heard Mr. Martin earlier in his comments reference this as a structural deficit. If I recall, and I want to come back to quoting the finance minister--hopefully not inappropriately--he said it's temporary and targeted spending. To me, that is not defined as a structural deficit.
As a final thing--I want to come back to this as my last point--we talked about this whole issue of jobs and whether it's easier to do a retrospective or a prospective forecast. Obviously, retrospective is always easiest: for obvious reasons it's easier to know.
I know we put a lot of emphasis on jobs created. Are we best just to catch our breath a little bit, knowing there is some positive news out there in the economy; to not sound death knells or dire warnings, but in fact just take a moment to allow some time to tell us how and how well this has been working? Do you have any comments on that?