The other 15 were people who did not follow the proper procedure in getting permission to run for political office. There is a procedure you have to follow: you must get permission from the Public Service Commission; you must be on leave without pay, for provincial and federal elections, during the election period; and it's discretionary for municipal elections.
Our biggest issue is with the municipal elections at this point. We have some federal in this group and we have some provincial.
Our decision on the naming and putting out the details of the case has been a difficult set of decisions. We have regulatory powers that are equivalent to the Privacy Act, in our legislation and our regulations, so we have to weigh the public interest with the private interests.
Our decision was, on a case-by-case basis, that we would put out summaries of our investigations and that we would name those individuals who were found to have been non-compliant in political activities at the federal and provincial levels, the thinking being that those are very public activities anyway. I was getting too many requests from some other candidates for information about a candidate and I thought, we'll just make those public. We are not doing it for municipal elections, because most of the time people don't know what their obligations are.
The one case where we found improper support of a political party has been taken to court. All our decisions are subject to judicial review. It is before the courts, so I can't say anything. I don't think I can tell you, either, unless you're in camera; I think I'd be in trouble.
The other cases are cases of fraud, where we had the same issue about naming names.