I go back to the potential lapsing of what may be an amount of $3 billion in infrastructure spending. You can answer this, but is it possible that the $3 billion will not have been spent on infrastructure projects, possibly to help the bottom line for the 2008-09 year? But then we're now being asked to rush $3 billion, which could very easily have been invested in infrastructure over the past year, with money allocated even the year before. That money has not been spent. Is it possible that now, if it does not get spent, that will show a better bottom line for 2008-09, but then we're now being asked to approve a blank for another $3 billion?
On March 5th, 2009. See this statement in context.