No. I wouldn't ask you to, but I also don't think it's really proper for anyone to let the public believe that this has the Auditor General's Good Housekeeping seal of approval, because we don't know that. A previous Auditor General said about a vote 5:
...the basic principle at the root of our concerns is simple: spending by departments must have the prior sanction of Parliament.
And this is not the case. You're saying that everything in a vote 5 has the prior sanction of Parliament. In 2002 the Auditor General had grave concerns about the process.