One minute, Chair?
Just to follow up--and it's difficult with 60 seconds--you would know, having been a former politician, that we are held to higher standards. We have to observe propriety in everything we do. It's also more than that; it's the appearance of propriety.
Do you feel, based on all of the things that might have been confusing to the general public--you have explained why certain statements on your website might have been misinterpreted--that the appearance of propriety has been tarnished because of some of the things you've had on your website or your corporate website, given the fact you were a former member of Parliament? Do you believe that the impression might have been left with potential clients or members of the general public that you could provide some access to government?