In 2005, John McCallum produced a significant expenditure review report that included, among other things, recommendations and a commitment, in fact, from PCO that $6 million of savings every year, for four years, would be found. I will note that over those four years, instead of savings of $24 million, PCO has actually spent more, to the tune of about $30 million.
Let me ask my second question, then, which has to do with significant increases just in time to actually be faced with a freeze and then be part of a department review. It certainly gives a distinct impression that this is padding. I'd like to have some idea of what you have, as PCO, been instructed to look at, what you're thinking of looking at in terms of how you're going to deal with, first, a freeze, and then participate as one of the departments participating in future cuts. Where are you going to find those savings?