Can I ask you about Larco? Has there been a cost-benefit analysis on whether it was smart to sell those buildings and lease them back? It seems every time the federal government wants to sell off buildings, they don't sell the dogs, they sell the crown jewels, or the jewels in the crown, because nobody wants to buy their dogs. This seems like bargain basement to me.
Where we used to deal directly with contractors, now we go to SNC-Lavalin and let them deal with the contractors--cost plus. Instead of hiring that contractor, we hire the contractor and pay SNC-Lavalin 14% to have the same work done.
Where is the business case for that?