Sure, I can address that.
In terms of why an external audit was requested, I can't begin to speculate on why our minister would want to have an external audit. From my perspective, it doesn't hurt to have someone from the outside, an impartial third party, take a look at the work we're doing internally to give us some assurance that things are being done appropriately.
That said, we had initiated a review of this area in December of last year, as John mentioned. The work that's being done by PricewaterhouseCoopers will only supplement what we're doing, so I don't think it's a waste of resources or money poorly spent. It will inform the work that we're doing in any case.
In terms of the work itself that PricewaterhouseCoopers is conducting, they are doing a two-phased approach. The first is to conduct specific audit procedures on the transactions that were brought to light as a result of the media report and to give us an assessment of whether those expenditures are reasonable and supportable. We have--