Yes. On our use of the term “realizable” versus “cashable”, in our view, cashable means if the government chooses to reduce a specific vote, an appropriation of a specific department, then we know that the cash will be in hand. We tend to use those words because departments also face significant operational needs. Those needs can go up or down, depending upon any number of conditions.
If the needs go up they may need to spend more. So at the end of the day, actions from a fiscal savings perspective may not be realizable to get some of the savings they've highlighted.
Again, we use those terms conceptually. We're not here to make a comment on whether there's too much fiscal restraint or not enough fiscal restraint relative to what the government's saying. If parliamentarians can get the analysis in a structured way, if we can get this information in a structured way, we could provide you with a risk analysis on both the fiscal side and the service-level side.