Well, Mr. Chairman, we realize that and that is the wording that appears in the bill. “Give preference to” means that when a product is requested—such as wood or steel—and greenhouse gas emissions are considered, wood would be deemed preferable as a material if the cost is the same. That is the important point: if it costs no more and it will make for a greater reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, wood should be given preference. This brings into focus the importance of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and also helping the forest industry.
When bids are being reviewed based on the drawings and specifications that have been drawn up, and when engineers have to select the lowest bidder, they will consider the cost of carrying out the project and the greenhouse gas emissions produced using steel and wood. Once it has been determined by how much those emissions could be reduced, if the cost is the same, preference will be given to wood. That is an even more important determination to make when there is a competitor. That way, the government will be a winner and save money.