Well, I guess I see a couple of factors. One, I assume he was basing his information on the budget numbers, and I think the report came out this summer, in June, and we now have more accurate information on the actual costs, which are considerably less than the $507 million. So the budget information is one piece of information, which includes contingency amounts. Our current estimates are in the $330 million from the $507 million.... So then, I guess, we'd have to compare the actual costs to his analysis.
On October 28th, 2010. See this statement in context.