On August 28, 2008, Le Devoir published a company profile. The company was yours. I would just like to quote your comments as reported by the journalist.
The most recent contract is for $8.9 million for rehabilitation work at the West Block on Parliament Hill, a contract which was “secured following a call for tenders and with no political involvement”, he added.
That is what you said to the reporter. You alluded to a contract for the West Block. Today you seem to be contradicting what you said to the reporter from Le Devoir on August 28, 2008. Which version should the committee be relying on?