We would all benefit by seeing what the overall, top-down plan is for expenditure restraint, how much of the savings of $1.8 billion, ongoing two years out, is achieved through attrition, how much through other measures, and again, what will the impact be on service levels.
Just from looking at bottom-up data, looking at department's HR plans, we don't get the sense—we looked at 10 departments and we see cumulative reductions of 1,100—that there seems to be at least a concerted plan early on that they're going to achieve all these savings through attrition. If you add up those 10 departments, we're talking about 160,000 employees, which is a large part of the core public service. It does remain to be seen that there are other aspects to the plan that we haven't seen in terms of savings, but again, we would like to see the plan.