Thank you very much for the question.
Chair, in the report we mention the models of three countries—I'm just trying to find it here—the U.S., Great Britain, and Australia. In each of those cases, the responsibility for their Parliament buildings rests with Parliament. There are different models that have been set up. In some cases, there are organizations that are directly within the Commons administration. In other places, there's the architect of the Capitol Hill in the U.S. But in all three models, the responsibility for the buildings rests with Parliament.
It's interesting when we go back to the report that was issued in 1992. That was just at the time that Great Britain had transferred responsibility from a government department to Parliament, and one of the recommendations then was that the government here should be studying that and keeping track of how that model was working. I think we all agree that any model is going to have some challenges with it, but certainly, by looking at these three countries.... And I believe that Public Works has or would have as part of its study looked at the various models elsewhere to see the advantages and disadvantages and to determine what would be the most appropriate mechanism to put in place here in Canada.