You answered my question, and that's good, but people are not using the ways you mention. When they come to the employment insurance offices, they're told to go and see their MP. They aren't directed elsewhere. Go see the MP, that's the easiest. Could you talk to these people, so that you take more responsibility for these things and we have more time to spend on other services to the population.
You said that you want to save $4.1 million, but as I told you earlier, you are going to save $5 million. An amount totalling $59 million was spent on travel, hospitality and conference expenses. Don't you find that a huge amount? You want to save $5 million to get to $54 million. I don't see how it is relevant to cut positions when you've already managed to reach your goal of $4.1 million by cutting travel and hospitality expenses.
I would like to know if you are still going to reduce the number of employees or if you are going to keep employees to do the work that is currently being done by the offices of MPs.